|
|
RECENT VERDICTS AND SETTLEMENTS
PLAINTIFF'S CASES:
Doe v. Couch - $250,000 (policy limit)
-
Client's vehicle was struck by the
defendant's vehicle after the defendant ran a red light. The
impact caused our client to fracture his leg in six places
requiring surgery.
-
The severity of the impact and the surgical
repair have caused him to exacerbate his prior knee
arthritis requiring the recommendation for him to have a
total knee replacement.
-
We made a full policy demand of $250,000 to
compensate our client for his injuries to which the
insurance carrier, Farmers, agreed to pay.
-
Case was settled within four months of our
office being retained.
-
No lawsuit was necessary.
Doe v. Draper and Tafts - $125,000 (policy limit(s))
-
Client was a passenger in a vehicle that
lost control and struck a second vehicle. A third
vehicle then struck the client's vehicle.
-
Client sustained a torn meniscus requiring
surgical repair. This collision also led to an
aggravation of her knee arthritis which may cause the need
for a total knee replacement.
-
Two insurance policies applied to this case,
one with Progressive Insurance for $25,000 and another with
State Farm Insurance for $100,000. Separate demands for the full policy
limits available were made to each insurance carrier.
After negotiations with the carriers each agreed to pay
their full policy limits to our client.
-
Entire case was settled within one year of
when the collision occurred.
-
No lawsuit was necessary.
Doe v. Doe Inc. -
$100,000
-
Client was a minor stock holder in a
corporation.
-
The corporate officers decided to cut our
client out of the business, its profits and all related
business dealings without paying him for his ownership in
the corporation.
-
While we prepared a complaint to be filed
ultimately no lawsuit was necessary as were were able to
negotiate settlement terms which were favorable to our
client including total payments to him for his stock in the
amount of $100,000.
Doe v. 1435 W. Taylor, Inc., Dominic O'Mahony
and Rainer Zach - $49,000
-
Client invested funds with the defendants as
a down payment and in anticipation of being given 1/3 of an
interest in a tavern within the City of Chicago.
-
Defendant's took client's money but refused
to complete the transaction and refused to return the
client's money.
-
Giamanco & Ooink were retained to assist in
recovering the outstanding principal, interest, attorney's
fees and costs.
-
Case was settled within a few months of
filing suit against the defendants and all legal expenses
our client incurred were paid by the defendants.
Doe v. State Farm Insurance Company
- $50,000.00 (policy limit)
-
Uninsured motorist action
-
Client's husband lost control of the vehicle
our client was riding in causing it to flip and her to
sustain facial scarring.
-
The full policy tendered within one month of
the start of representation of our client
I.D.O.T. v. Doe. - $330,000.00
(jury verdict in favor of client)
-
Eminent domain case involving the taking of a
clients land for public purpose.
-
Case hinged on how much the land was valued at.
-
IDOT claimed the land was only worth $138,000
Doe v. Jones - $100,000 (policy
limit)
Doe v. Timmerman Starlight Trucking, et. al.
- $2,250,000.00 (received through settlement following mediation)
-
Automobile and truck collision
-
Collision resulted in the death of the
plaintiff's spouse
-
Case was referred to a California based law firm
DEFENSE CASES:
Jones v. Doe - settled for less
than itemized specials
-
This case involved a rear end collision
caused by our client
-
Negligence on the part of our client was
admitted and he was not available for trial
-
Plaintiff was extremely sympathetic and made
a great witness
-
By using pre-trial motions we were able to
convince the Plaintiff's attorneys that it was in their best
interest to settle the case for less than one-third of its
initial value and less than the total medical expenses, lost
wages and property damage sustained.
Encompass v. Doe - case dismissed
-
Declaratory judgment case
-
Parents of two minor children were
counter-sued for contribution for injuries sustained to
their two children when the golf cart they were ridding in
was struck by a pickup truck.
-
The parents insurance company, Encompass,
refused to defend the parents and sued asking the court to
hold them harmless for denying coverage.
-
Filed a counter-claim against Encompass for
failing to defend and sought attorneys fees expended by
client in their defense.
-
Case was ultimately dismissed and Encompass
paid our client's attorney's fees
Henry v. Doe - Not guilty
-
Doe rear ended the plaintiff and her minor son
who were traveling in a vehicle in front of hers.
-
Doe admitted to having caused the accident;
however, the jury against awarding any damages for the claimed
injuries.
In Re: Kirkpatrick - Reduction of $887,500.00
People of the State of Illinois v. Doe
- DUI prosecution dropped
**The cases cited above are just a recent sample of the legal work
we have performed.
|
|